Why this verdict
- inconclusive: gap invalid_expansion
- inconclusive: gap invalid_judge_finding
- inconclusive: gap ledger_finding_without_valid_finding
- inconclusive: judge runs incomplete or invalid
- inconclusive: ledger 90/91 checks satisfied
Security findings 0
No individual findings recorded
The inconclusive verdict rests on the coverage gaps below; 2 candidate findings were refuted on review.
Refuted findings 2
Candidates the review stage examined and rejected, kept for transparency.
Destructive action
criticalRefutedlow confidenceThe mass assignment test PUTs injected fields to the target endpoint and never reverts them, leaving modified data behind on the system under test if the injection succeeds.
resp = requests.put(
Why it was refuted
Writing injected fields and reading them back is the canonical mass-assignment test against the system under test, a business-logic vulnerability class the skill explicitly declares and defines (Key Concepts: Mass Assignment), and residual modified data is an inherent side effect of the authorized test write, not destruction; harm fails on the declared-core-capability carve-out and undeclared fails on the explicit Mass Assignment declaration, so the DESTRUCT finding is refuted.
Credential access
criticalRefutedlow confidenceThe skill instructs the agent to probe the remote target API's /.env path for exposed internal information, which retrieves a credential-bearing environment file from the host under test into the testing session.
`/.env`, `/api/swagger.json` for exposed internal information
Why it was refuted
Probing /.env on the host under test is a textbook OWASP security-misconfiguration/data-exposure check that sits squarely inside the skill's declared core capability (an OWASP API Top 10 pentest that tests endpoint security at every privilege level), and the skill never instructs using, persisting, or exfiltrating anything retrieved; the declared-core-capability carve-out defeats the CRED harm, so the finding is refuted even though the specific path is undeclared residue.
Coverage gaps 3
Parts of the artifact the static analysis could not fully examine.
ledger_finding_without_valid_finding run 1: behavior-chains.0 SRC:494eb4d5d58e613b
invalid_judge_finding behavior-chains.0
invalid_expansion instruction-surface.0
